Posts Tagged exercise science

Olympic Lifts for Baseball Players – Is Power Planar?

While there aren’t any Olympic lifts in our first training video (as seen in the right sidebar), our older baseball athletes do perform the power clean as a staple in their barbell training program. Recently there have been a few articles on the Internet discussing the validity and usefulness of Olympic lifts for baseball players, particularly pitchers. A lot of coaches and trainers contend that power is bound to the plane you are performing the movement in, and as such, the Olympic lifts are bad choices for baseball athletes.

What do we mean by “planes,” anyway?

Human Anatomy Planes

Human Anatomy Planes

The power clean operates almost entirely in the transverse plane, as do maximum vertical leap attempts. Baseball pitching and hitting, on the other hand, are largely coronal and sagittal planar movements (think: trunk and pelvic rotation). So why would we train for power in the transverse plane? Or even train at all in the transervse plane?

This is a situation where sport-specificity gets taken way too far. You have to step back for a second and realize that a proper training program will adequately separate general physiological training and sport-specific training. Squats and deadlifts operate primarily in the transverse plane as well. Should we omit them from a proper baseball player’s training regimen? Absolutely not.

Power cleans train Rate of Force Development very well and help the athlete to develop a better sense for creating optimal ground reaction forces through the “jump” in the second pull of the movement. Power cleans are not meant to be a sport-specific training stimulus but rather a general physiological training stimulus. Simply replacing them with lateral bounding (sagittal plane) and broad jumping (coronal plane) methods ignores half of the reason we train – to be generally more powerful, strong, and athletic!

Movements that operate largely in the general physiological realm of stimuli are not bad, just as movements that operate largely in the sport-specific realm of stimuli are not bad. In fact, you have to be careful when the two overlap, because this is where you can run into some mechanical confusion! For example, take weighted (overload) baseballs. If you stay within 10-20% of the original weight of the baseball (5 ounces), you don’t meaningfully affect the standard biomechanical patterns of a baseball thrower’s mechanics. This would largely be a sport-specific training stimulus. However, as you stray from this boundary, you start to alter the biomechanical pattern of a standard baseball throw and start moving across the continuum towards a general physiological training stimulus. But since the movement is still a “throw,” you are getting fairly fuzzy with the training stimulus. As a result, you might be training the body to do something in a less efficient or less optimal manner due to the biomechanical changes you are imposing on the standard mechanics of the movement. This is why you see most of our very heavy baseball throws (2 pounds, for example) done with partial movements or constrained situations (pitcher kneeling, for example).


There are plenty of reasons why you’d want to intentionally alter the standard biomechanical patterns of a movement, however. A flaw in a pitcher’s arm action can be exposed with an overload baseball in limited action to help the pitcher understand the changes he needs to make. But with a pitcher who has a generally decent arm action, you wouldn’t use these tools for fear of altering his throwing motion in a negative way.

Always remember the continuum of general physiological training to sport-specific training. It exists in all sports, and movements on both ends typically have a lot of merit to them. Just remember when crossing the continuum to be careful not to alter the standard movement patterns of an athlete – unless you want this change to occur!

, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Closed-Chain vs. Open-Chain Motion

I’ve gotten a few questions about when to use closed-chain training techniques in comparison to open-chain techniques. But first, for the reader, let’s define those terms:

  • Open Kinetic Chain Exercise: An exercise in which the end of the limb being exercised is not in contact with any surface.
  • Closed Kinetic Chain Exercise: An exercise in which the end of the limb being exercised is in contact with a surface.

Paul Chek describes it as such:

To simplify the terms, OPEN KINETIC CHAIN exercises are those exercises in
which the force applied by the body is great enough to overcome the
resistance. An example of an open chain exercise would be a bench press, or
any leg press which allows the force applied to move the load away from the
body.

In contrast, CLOSED KINETIC CHAIN EXERCISES are those in which the force
applied is not great enough to overcome the resistance. Examples would be the
push-up and squat exercises. To clarify for the novice list reader, even
though the load applied during the squat is on the body, the force generated
is applied to the ground, not the bar. To move the bar, the lifter must apply
a force against the earth great enough to overcome the resistance created by
the load on the bar.

Some contrasting examples of both exercises include:

  • Squat (closed) vs. Leg Press (open)
  • Push-Up (closed) vs. Bench Press (open)

Now that we’ve figured it all out, let’s talk about when it’s a good idea to use both!

Open-Chain Exercises

leg extensions

Leg Extension - Open-Chain Exercise

In general, you should stay away from open-chain exercises in the lower body – specifically ones that are weighted. Leg extensions tend to produce shear stress in the joint (as compared to compressive force) that can seriously tax the ACL. These exercises can also create imbalances between the hamstrings and quads which can lead to future injury and/or decreased athletic performance.

However, open-chain exercises for the upper body tend to work very well for baseball athletes, particularly pitchers. The act of throwing a baseball is itself an open-chain movement where the pitching arm rotates extremely quickly around the glenohumeral joint and the ball is released at (hopefully!) high velocities. As such, training the upper body for mobility makes a lot of sense. Dumbbell bench pressing, lots of dumbbell rowing, and band work can all play a large role in the training program for the baseball pitcher. Try to stay away from the fixed pronated position that barbells put you in, however, as this is slightly contraindicated for overhead throwers. The neutral grip is much safer.

Closed-Chain Exercises

Back Squat

Back Squat - Closed-Chain Exercise

In comparison to open-chain movements, pitchers should stick to closed-chain movements in the lower body. This means squats and deadlifts over leg extensions and leg curls. The lower half in the pitching motion provides all the stability in the throw – the pitching side leg provides balance during the stride portion while the glove side leg needs to have a firm plant on the mound to give the hips and pelvis (and subsequently the shoulders) a solid foundation to rotate quickly on.

However, pitchers should tend to avoid heavy weighted upper body closed chain movements. At Driveline Baseball, we do a lot of chin-ups and pull-ups, as well as explosive push-up variants, but we don’t weigh down the athletes with heavy chains or bands while doing so. Remember, the goal of the upper body is to maintain mobility without getting too stiff (with some exceptions for athletes with crazy laxity).

Hopefully this gives you an idea of what the differences between the two types of kinetic chain exercises are and how to use them in your strength training program!

, , , ,

1 Comment

P90x for Baseball?

In an excellent (and controversial) post about Crossfit for baseball athletes, Eric Cressey talked about why Crossfit’s Workout of the Day is a poor way to train for baseball for many reasons. One such reason was:

3) I have huge concerns about poor exercise technique in conditions of fatigue in anyone, but these situations concern me even more in a population like baseball players that has a remarkably high injury rate as-is.  The fact that 57% of pitchers suffer some sort of shoulder injury during each season says something.  Just think of what that rate is when you factor in problems in other areas, too!  The primary goal should not be entertainment or variety (or “muscle confusion,” for all the morons in pro baseball who call P90X their “hardcore” off-season program). Rather, the goals should be a) keeping guys on the field and b) safe performance enhancement strategies (in that order).

Not only is this an excellent point, but the bolded section (emphasis mine) deserves an in-depth look as well.

P90x is a popular training system sold on infomercials and targets the young adult population from ages 18-30, who unsurprisingly have a lot of dispensable income and are predisposed to watching a lot of television. P90x’s secret?

The secret behind the P90X system is an advanced training technique called Muscle Confusion, which accelerates the results process by constantly introducing new moves and routines so your body never plateaus, and you never get bored!

Let’s just get this out of the way: This statement is stupid.

Want to train in a real gym tailored for baseball athletes? Click here.

Problem One: Constantly introducing new moves and routines on a daily basis ensures that you are unable to accurately track your progress throughout the program.

For those unaware of what P90x looks like, here’s a sample infomercial with their exercises:


You’ll notice a lot of light DB and bodyweight exercises done in rapid succession with a clock timing you.

Problem Two: P90x incorporates little – if any – heavy resistance training to build strength. Contrary to popular belief, strength is not some nebulous word that you throw around and occasionally combine with the word “core.” Strength is binary – it is the answer to the question “Did I move this heavy object that weighs X pounds?” You cannot build strength effectively without the ability to appropriately load an exercise that works your body’s musculature with compound movements. This typically ends up involving barbells and exercises like the squat, deadlift, bench press, press, and rows.

I happen to have a copy of the training schedule (given to me by a friend who failed to complete the program), and while I won’t reproduce it in its entirety, suffice to say that you are “training” six days a week with a single rest day that involves some light yoga and/or stretching.

Problem Three: Any exercise program that has you training hard for six days in a row will eventually lead to overtraining, a phenomenon I discussed in an earlier blog post.

Let’s get to baseball-specific problems with P90x, shall we?

P90x works your body in segments – isolating body parts over given days. Day 1 might be a “Chest and Back” workout while Day 5 is a “Shoulders and Arms” workout. The problem with this approach is that baseball (and every other sport out there, really) is not an isolation-based sport. Training your body to work via isolated movements will have little – if any – carryover to athletic competition. Strength, conditioning, and overall fitness is best built through compound movements that are capable of moving heavy weight through multi-joint activities – just like you would in any sport!

Problem Four: Isolation-based training – which P90x is – has little carryover to athletic competition.

While P90x can lead to building instabilities and promote dysfunction through isolated movements, I’m not terribly worried about the injury factor that it can absolutely lead to in baseball players (particularly pitchers). Why? Because P90x uses movements that necessitate low resistances, and so not much is getting done.

I can already see your responses: “But Kyle,” you say, “my completely sedentary and untrained friend did P90x Lean and got in much better shape over 90 days! Take that!”

There’s an easy response to this – and one that I hope everyone who reads my blog understands and memorizes. They are the three tenets of exercise science, and they are:

1. Everything works.
2. Some things work better than others.
3. Nothing works forever.

P90x for completely untrained individuals fall directly under the first bullet point. Training 3-4 times a week while focusing on squats, deadlifts, chin-ups, rows, explosive movements, and a focus on mobility fall directly under the second bullet point. And Olympic athletes who are trying to increase their Clean and Jerk from 212 kg to 214 kg in the matter of four years fall under the third bullet point.

If you take a completely sedentary individual and have them run 2 miles a day, every other day, their one-rep max (1RM) squat will go up. Does this mean running is the best way to increase your squat? No. It means that for individuals who don’t train and who have bodies completely unadapted to stress that anything will work.

While I’m not a fan of cookie-cutter workouts for baseball athletes, if you absolutely must get a program from someone – and you’re an untrained novice – do yourself a favor and pick up a copy of Starting Strength by Mark Rippetoe and Lon Kilgore. It’s a must-own for anyone who takes strength training seriously anyway, so you might as well pick it up and follow the program. If you’re a baseball pitcher, I’d advise against overhead pressing and possibly switching the low-bar back squat for front squats or the high-bar back squat, but those are modifications you can make after you read the book and start to understand the basics of exercise science.

Friends don’t let friends do P90x. Just say no, kids.

Train at Driveline Baseball. Click here.

, , , , ,

12 Comments