
Archive for category Motion Analysis
Our Motion Capture Lab: The Overview
Posted by Kyle in Motion Analysis, Notes on June 6, 2011
Since the weather’s gotten a bit better, we’ve decided to do our high-speed biomechanical analysis filming outside. Matthew (my research assistant) and I took the equipment outside where we continued progress on our three-dimensional filming model.
Today, we filmed a few different movement patterns:
- Baseball pitching off a mound
- Shot put throw
- Baseball swing off a tee
For those unaware of how it works, we reconstruct our control object of precisely known size and put it where we want to capture the motion.
We then chalk the corners of the object, indicating the boundaries of where we can film. After that, we film the cube from the number of high-speed cameras we’ll be using. By doing this, each camera is then calibrated with the specific locations of the cube. The cameras will not move from these positions while the trials are being filmed.
We then film the subject performing whatever motion we want to analyze, using all of our high-speed cameras.
And lastly, we’ll digitize the two-dimensional video files, creating a three-dimensional model from the video files. We then have kinematics we can store in a database for future analysis and a three-dimensional skeletal model we can use for coaching and training purposes for the athlete.
We’ve improved the process a number of times, making setup much quicker. We can deploy the motion capture lab at a mobile site in under an hour, and then film test subjects all day. This makes our lab setup ideal for filming pitchers in competition without being intrusive – no external markers are necessary on the athlete.
Interested? Look into our biomechanical video analysis services, and contact us today.
Biomechanics and Me?
Posted by Kyle in Links, Mechanics, Motion Analysis on March 21, 2011
I made a guest FanPost titled Biomechanics and Me? over at Lookout Landing, a very popular (and great) Seattle Mariners blog in the SB Nation network. It talks about my history of building our biomechanics lab.
Even prior to Graham’s post, I had been working on building a low-cost biomechanical analysis laboratory in Seattle. For those unaware, high-speed cameras were basically unavailable at reasonable price points in 2008 until the Casio Exilim EX-F1 came out for $1000. Even then, these cameras weren’t enough to do the advanced biomechanical analysis required to even shine a light on the “mechanics” of throwing a baseball. It would require multiple cameras, off-the-shelf software that could solve for kinematics/kinetics (and provide a digitization solution), custom algorithms that could solve the synchronization issue between these consumer-grade cameras (commercial ones do this automatically), and a precisely measured control object.
Commercial packages are available, but cost $15-17k for a two-camera setup that is not sufficient for working with movements that occur in all three planes so rapidly – like baseball pitching. You’re looking at $25-30k at the bare minimum with off-the-shelf packages, plus customization and training.
Head over there and take a look if it interests you!
Stephen Strasburg, Mechanics, and his “Timing Flaw”
Posted by Kyle in Mechanics, Motion Analysis on March 8, 2011
Tom Verducci has a very interesting article about Stephen Strasburg: Mechanical flaw will be red flag for Strasburg even after return. In it, he says:
The answer to why Strasburg blew out — and why his future is a risky one — may lie in his mechanics. Several pitching coaches quietly predicted Strasburg was at risk before he broke down. He will continue to bear risky loads on his elbow and shoulder unless he changes the way he throws.
To understand the danger of the glitch, first you must understand the most critical point of a pitcher’s delivery. The pitching motion is a kinetic chain of events, carefully calibrated and timed, like a Formula One car’s engine, for maximum efficiency. But above all others one link of the chain is most important: the “late cocking phase,” or the phase during which the shoulder reaches its maximum external rotation with the baseball raised in the “loaded” position (typically, above the shoulder) and ready to come forward.
His description is not exactly correct. The late cocking phase is when the arm is laying back in maximum external rotation (MER) as he points out, but it has nothing to do with where the baseball is raised in the “loaded” position. The “loaded” position he describes is the “high cock position” before the arms lays back and precedes the late cocking phase.

Late Cocking Phase
It’s not all that important, but it’s worth pointing out.
He goes on to say:
Here is the key to managing the torque levels in the late cocking phase: timing. The ball should be loaded in the late cocking phase precisely when the pitcher’s stride foot lands on the ground.
Interesting. His source?
“If he’s too early or too late he winds up with more force on the shoulder and elbow,” said Glenn Fleisig, Ph.D., research director for the American Sports Medicine Institute in Birmingham, Ala. “The energy gets passed to the arm before it was ready, or after.”
Now this is very interesting. Neither Dr. Fleisig nor ASMI has ever said that this was a specific mechanical flaw that can cause injury. Dr. Fleisig even went on to say:
“It’s not a case of too much armpit angle,” Fleisig said, referring to the moment when the elbows are raised. “It’s that the arm hasn’t rotated yet.”
Fleisig spoke in general about the glitch some pitchers have with the raised elbow, not Strasburg in particular. When I asked him if this glitch puts pitchers at greater risk of injury, he said, “Totally. It is risky and dangerous. That’s a red flag. Definitely.”
This makes sense for a lot of reasons. In Humeral Torque in Professional Baseball Pitchers, Sabick et al. demonstrated that loading rate is an important factor when considering bone stress. The absolute value of MER may not be as important as the rate at which MER is achieved when it comes to evaluating stressors on the arm. If two pitchers have an MER measurement of 170 degrees but Pitcher A’s Shoulder External Rotation Angular Velocity is twice as fast as Pitcher B, then it makes sense that Pitcher A would be more likely to injure connective tissue around his shoulder and/or elbow.
We’ve been doing these types of measurements for more than a year here at Driveline Baseball in our biomechanics lab, as pointed out in January 2010 in the article Kinematic Analysis: Wrist to Elbow Relationship.

What actually blows my mind is this quote:
How important is this specific timing? I spoke with a key decision maker for one club last week who, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said his club will not consider any pitcher — by draft, trade or free agency — who does not have the baseball in the loaded position at the time of foot strike.
Wow! If true, this is a pretty amazing statement to make! Simply eyeballing these types of metrics from 30 FPS broadcast-quality video is dangerous stuff. High-speed video should be taken of any and all pitchers you are interested in evaluating (if possible) and ideally a planar biomechanical analysis can be done without too much hassle.
However, it’s good to see that these issues are being talked about in the major media outlets. It helps reinforce the need for biomechanical analyses of pitchers to gather a large amount of data and to make inroads on mitigating throwing-related injuries while maximizing performance at the same time.
Not Using High-Speed Video? You’re Missing 5 MPH.
Posted by Kyle in Motion Analysis, Training on November 1, 2010
We use high-speed video in our Pitching Program and also make it available to our Semi-Private Training groups at low or no cost. As I’ve said many times on this site, if you aren’t using at least regular-speed video to check your mechanics, you’re wasting your time. And if you have a pitching coach who just catches your bullpen or goes through drills with you without using video… you’re wasting your money AND your time.
That’s how serious I feel about video analysis.
However, standard video isn’t enough. Shooting video at 30 frames per second (FPS) is insufficient for real analysis of your pitching mechanics. Why?
That’s why. When you take video of the blindingly-fast internal rotation of the arm at upwards of 1100 degrees/sec, you get something like the above picture. How can you accurately determine timing? How about Shoulder Maximum External Rotation? What about the precise moment of footstrike or ball release?
It’s impossible. Without high-speed cameras, you’re just making broad guesses based on faulty video – or worse, no video!
Can using high-speed video result in +5 MPH on your fastball?
Yes. One of our HS pitchers preparing for the college season just underwent a biomechanical analysis of his pitching motion – complete with sticky reflective markers all over his body. (This service will be available to the public soon in our Pitching Program – yet another reason why you should join a Semi-Private Training group – to get early access to training techniques at low or no cost!) We identified a major flaw in his mechanics – his glove arm shoulder was opening far too early into foot strike. After some drills to get the feel of the shoulders rotating later, he got on the hill and was immediately throwing 3-5 MPH faster. It was a scary change, to be honest – I know, because I was catching his bullpen!
This is a change we made in just one day. After he refines his mechanics and trains hard, he’ll be throwing even harder.
If you’re not using high-speed video, you’re leaving fastball velocity on the table. Train at Driveline Baseball and get the edge in training and technology.








