Keeping Pitching Simple – Setting Artificial Ceilings for Your Athletes

At the 2015 ABCA Convention, the overarching message from pitching coaches and attendees alike was the idea that things need to be “kept simple.” That going into deep detail was ultimately very confusing and hard to understand, and not necessary – after all, pitching effectively simply involves throwing strikes, locating well, having a good pitch selection, and keeping the hitter off balance. What could be more difficult than that?

Let’s back up. I think most people would agree that sprinting is a much simpler activity than pitching – it’s mostly in a single plane, it doesn’t require a second party that is reacting to what you’re doing, it’s generally easier to train for, etc. As we all know, Usain Bolt is one of the best sprinters in the world and of all-time:

Usain Bolt

Unfortunately, sprinting turns out to be quite a bit difficult to understand – according to lead researchers in the field like Dr. Frans Bosch:

“It’s very early stages in understanding,” he says. “It could be many, many years still before we know more. If you look at a very important development in science over the last 15 years called dynamic systems theory and complex theory, we have learned that the answers to our questions are actually further away than ever before. We’re probably not getting closer to the answer, we’re just getting closer to asking the right questions.”

Pitching is heavily triplanar (sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes of movement) and tough to analyze using video without multiple cameras – often synchronized to get actual joint kinematics and kinetics through deeper analysis. If an Olympic sport that has been researched to death isn’t even close to getting the final answers, how can we hope to “simplify” pitching for our instructors and coaches?

A pitching coordinator who was recently at my facility for a week made probably one of the smartest comments I’ve ever heard in my life. He was talking to a group of us including me, two college pitchers, and two pro pitchers who train at my facility. When the topic of pitchability came up, he said: “We honestly don’t know a damn thing about how to get guys out. Or really how to throw strikes.” This is a guy who has been a pro coach for 10+ years in multiple organizations, and he’s absolutely correct. If we knew how to teach throwing strikes and getting guys out, everyone would have sniper-like command and would never walk hitters – and offense would be even more abysmal than it is in today’s MLB game. It is no different with velocity – if it was easy to teach velocity, then everyone would throw 90+ MPH. Instead, you have coaches claiming: “It’s impossible to develop velocity, and that should not come before ‘proper’ pitching mechanics anyway” as a safe valve for their own ignorance.

Your Job is NOT to Make it Simple for Yourself – But for Your Athlete

I’m not saying you should explain complex mechanical concepts to your 12 year old pitchers; we don’t do that, either. We’ve designed specific drills and underload/overload training mechanisms to help train those concepts without our verbal instruction, however, since verbal discussion of complex mechanical movements is largely useless outside of an education setting. You absolutely need to make the athlete feel and understand what is going on without verbally terrorizing him (kudos to Brent Strom for the phrase), but to take that attitude yourself is to deny the very reality that throwing hard and throwing strikes and increasing spin rates and staying healthy and, and, and…. are all REALLY hard problems that are as of yet, totally unsolved.

We’re getting better at asking the right questions, but to simplify your approach and ignore the deeper pool of research – like the 261 pages in Hacking the Kinetic Chain hopes to detail – then you’re only doing yourself and your athletes a huge disservice by setting an artificial ceiling on them. It’s impossible to get better if you aren’t interested in delving into the unknown; experiment and research as much as possible to turn over all the rocks you can.

Control Problems on the Mound? It’s Not Always “Mental.”

How many times have you heard these lines?

  • “It’s a mental issue.”
  • “He has the yips.”
  • “He lost the ability to throw strikes.”
  • “It’s all in his head.”
  • “He’s mentally weak.”

They’re catch-all phrases that hope to capture the essence of why a pitcher like Daniel Bard can put up these kinds of insane runs:

It’s generally assumed that pitchers like Bard simply lose it mentally and can’t throw strikes because of some ephemeral issue that no one can pinpoint. Let me state for the record that this kind of thing DOES happen, but very often it’s actually an underlying physiological issue, not a mental/psychological one (or at least one rooted in those areas). Daniel Bard can still throw 95+ MPH – just like a handful of my pro clients who were throwing at their top velocities despite spraying the ball all over the place. None of them reported pain, soreness, or weakness – so it couldn’t be physical, right?

Unfortunately, that’s not how it always works.

First, let’s take a closer look at just how hard it is to throw strikes.

A Matter of Timing

Throwing a five ounce baseball with raised seams to a catcher at a target of your choosing is not exactly the easiest thing to do, yet the actual physics-to-performance marriage goes largely unexamined. Here’s two slow-motion videos shot from the side and overhead to capture the two main planes that the arm’s trajectory is on (capturing internal rotation, elbow extension, and trunk rotation). Aaron West is on the left, Taiki Green is on the right.

Aaron West vs. Taiki Green

The distal wrist of the pitching arm (and therefore, the ball) is on a weird curvilinear path around the body that is very individual to the pitcher in question. However, for simplicity’s sake to understand the basic geometry behind throwing strikes, we’ll make the arm path a simple circle below:

Tangent Arc

Imagine the black circle is the arm path and the blue line with points A and B is the ball’s trajectory. This is a line drawn tangent to the arc, and this is how a ball is thrown from the arm path. A line drawn tangent to a circle has only one point of intersection (inflection point).

So, now that the basic geometry lesson is over, here’s how it relates to throwing a baseball at a target – a baseball is ejected from the hand at a “release point” that has just one point of intersection with the hand (the moment of separation between the baseball and the hand, usually the middle finger). Now imagine that the circle above is rotating at something like 4500 degrees per second (internal rotation) but is also being deformed at up to 2500 degrees per second by increasing the radius of the circle (elbow extension), and you have a good idea of just how difficult it is to “repeat” your mechanics. (Take a look at an interactive display – change the point on the circle just slightly, and see how much the tangent line deviates.)

Actually, when you think of it that way, how is it even possible to repeat your mechanics? How is it possible that professional pitchers can hit their target on a somewhat regular basis? Mathematically, it seems to require superhuman reaction speeds and timing ability.

Physiologically, the body is one hell of a weapon.

Proprioception is Everything

Your body has the ability to automatically and unconsciously sense and control motor units in a complex way to perform incredibly difficult tasks – like ballistically ejecting an object at 90+ MPH towards a target with some degree of precision. Your body uses a set of levers (bones), pulleys (muscles, tendons, ligaments), and a central processing unit (brain, nerves installed in the muscles) to coordinate everything together to make minute changes that are impossible to consciously repeat. This is the genesis of the so-called “10,000 hour rule” as made popular by Outliers, and the MUCH better book by Geoff Colvin, Talent is Overrated.

Proprioception is the sense of the relative position of various body parts in relation to one another, usually while they are being moved. This is a generally automatic function of the body – you don’t think about firing the muscles of the upper leg in relation to the lower leg while you’re walking, nor do you think about expanding your chest manually when you breathe. When the body is damaged, there may be a temporary loss of proprioception, but the feedback given to the nervous system generally makes quick adaptations and allows for quick recovery.

For healthy pitchers, this is why we do a lot of overload/underload training using wrist weights, PlyoCare balls, and Driveline Elite Weighted Baseballs. By forcing the body to adapt to new stimuli through similar ranges of motion (and with vastly different ballistic profiles), the motor units of the pitching arm become more efficient.

However, for injured pitchers, it’s a completely different story – and that includes both pitchers who were previously injured and are now healthy in addition to pitchers who are injured but display no symptoms of injury.

Rebuilding Proprioception Through Rehabilitation – Early Intervention is Key

Rehabilitation of previously injured pitchers is far more complex than sending them to physical therapy after surgery and “returning to function” based on strength and skill tests. A pitcher who has had UCL graft/replacement (Tommy John surgery) will now have holes drilled in his arm plus a brand new tendon in place of the original ligament, not to mention severe cuts to the pronator/flexor mass that were required to get to the connective tissue in the first place.

Tommy John

Retraining the pitcher’s proprioceptive ability is similar to what we do with our healthy pitchers, though the focus is generally more on partial and constraint movements that get backchained into the full throwing motion. By using overloaded drills to help force the body to feel the proper movement patterns to more safely generate velocity, we can start the primary programming of the interval throwing program off with an accelerated pace. It is critical that when the athlete starts interval throwing that he immediately starts these simple and safe drills, because the minute a pitcher picks up a baseball, he will revert to primary programming – even if that programming is detrimental to his arm’s health. Furthermore, primary programming is not always applicable, because leftover proprioceptive sense believes the ligament is in one place, the forearm flexors have sufficient strength, the biceps work in a certain way…

Get where I’m going with this? Is it any wonder that a pitcher who seems “healthy” after surgery has ridiculous control problems? It may partially be due to psychological fear of getting on a mound and “cutting loose,” but often it is due to proprioceptive failure. Remapping the proprioceptive senses is incredibly important, and one that is often lost in the physical therapy world. Even if the PT uses Bosu Balls or other unstable surfaces to work on proprioceptive sense, these are not sport-specific and have little to no carryover to ballistic training.

Rebuilding and Regaining Control

For athletes who have microtears in their ligaments or otherwise damaged tissues that they cannot feel – ligaments have poor blood supply and innervation – this can have a serious negative impact on their ability to throw strikes. The proprioceptive mapping of how to throw strikes may be on one setting but cannot adequately adjust to the new situation of slightly damaged tissue that presents no symptoms to the central nervous system. This is why pitchers who have destabilization of the elbow tend to display control/command issues well before their UCL ruptures, even if their velocity does not significantly drop in the process.

Close monitoring of these markers should be done by all professional teams, and athletes themselves should integrate proprioceptive remapping exercises into their training.

The next time you think your favorite pitcher has simply “lost his marbles” and has developed “Steve Blass disease,” consider that maybe he has a serious injury that is simply asymptomatic. Just because he doesn’t feel pain doesn’t mean he’s not hurt – and that’s one of the most frustrating things any athlete can go through.

The Reinvention of Casey Weathers – Restoring What Tommy John Took

Casey Weathers was the first round pick of the Colorado Rockies (8th overall) in 2007 after putting up incredible numbers at Vanderbilt – striking out 75 over 49.1 innings while allowing fewer than one hit + walk per inning pitched. Casey was throwing 95-97 MPH at the time with a wipeout slider, and was tagged as a fast-mover. In his first full season in Tulsa (AA), he was off to a good start, striking out a ton of hitters and getting very weak contact with his ERA hovering just around 3. He would hit 100+ MPH on several outings in the hot weather. He’d also throw in the 2008 Olympics for the United States, taking home the bronze medal for his efforts.

Casey Weathers - USA

Things were good, until his command started to desert him, and it finally happened – his elbow hurt after throwing a pitch. He had an MRI done on his arm by the team doctor, which led to the following report:

FINDINGS:
There has been interval development of increased signal and poor definition of the mid to
proximal fibers of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament compatible with
ligament rupture. There is mild edema in the adjacent flexor digitorum superficialis
muscle compatible with mild muscle strain injury.

IMPRESSION:
Rupture of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament as well as a mild strain
of the adjacent flexor digitorum superficialis muscle.

For those not aware what that means, it’s not good news. On October 20th, 2008, Casey Weathers had a follow-up meeting with Dr. Lewis Yocum to receive the official bad news, and eleven days later had his ulnar collateral ligament replaced. Tommy John surgery had struck yet another pitcher.

The Dark Side of Tommy John Surgery

Tommy John

On a late night rant about elbow reconstruction surgery, I said this:

Casey was one of the unlucky ones; the ones who don’t magically throw harder and have no problems after having major surgery on a body part that they lean on to earn a living. This is more common than you think – remember Kris Medlen? Ryan Madson? Jack Armstrong? Daniel Hudson? Andrew Brackman?

When you drill holes in the bone, cut into the soft tissue, and perform reconstructive surgery, serious complications can occur. We accept this as a fact of everyday life when it comes to major surgery on other body parts, like our heart or even rotator cuff, but many believe elbow surgery is this simple procedure that has no issues that come along with it. These people are wrong, and spreading this sentiment is very, very dangerous.

Casey complained of post-operative pain and obtained another MRI in March 2009, which found:

There is very mild bone edema along the graft tunnel in the ulna. Posterior to the intact graft there is a
small fragment of bone along the posterior inferior margin of the medial epicondyle
separated 2 mm from the condyle at the expected origin of the posterior band and in part
involving posterior bundle humeral attachment. There is surrounding granulation and/or
inflammatory tissue. There is adjacent remodeled sclerotic margin with mild deformity of
the adjacent tip of the medial malleolus again posterior to the graft. These changes are
best appreciated in entirety on coronal 17 sagittal 07/06. Linear band of soft tissue
inflammation and scar tissue extends along the posterior margin medial epicondyle as
well with elevation of the capsule 1-2 mm from the bone in this location, likely post-
surgical related.

Summary: Casey had a lot of post-operative problems with his elbow, primarily a bone spur that started to develop.

Throughout 2010, his rehabilitation continued to progress slowly. Casey would have a PRP injection in his elbow before the season, which did little to improve the situation. Casey wouldn’t throw in a game until late 2010 – nearly 20 months post-operation. And when he did, he would feel pain near the ball release phase of the delivery, and was walking a lot of guys despite his velocity nearly fully returning.

The list of pitchers who lose enough proprioception from elbow to fingertips is long and varied, yet Casey was – and others undoubtedly are – branded “mentally weak” for being unable to throw strikes.

However, research in the Driveline Sports Science lab shows that forearm fitness, endurance, and strength are strongly correlated with command. During elbow surgery, the flexor-pronator mass is sliced open, and during rehabilitation, it atrophies as the elbow is immobilized for months on end. Is it any wonder that so many athletes who have had Tommy John surgery return only to find their ability to throw strikes has completely abandoned them – despite the fact they may feel no different?

EMG Sensors

After pitching in 2011 and 2012 with ridiculous walk rates (including 53 free passes in 34 innings in 2012) and pain in his forearm, Casey had an MRI and exploratory surgery to confirm that the bone spur in his elbow was near the posterior aspect of the anterior bundle of the UCL, and though little to no damage was done to the UCL, this bone chip was causing serious issues in Casey’s arm. The loose bodies were removed and Casey would undergo rehab yet again, missing all of the 2013 season.

The Chicago Cubs notified Casey they would not be renewing his contract, and Casey signed with the San Francisco Giants for the 2014 season.

Teamless in Seattle – Work Begins

Though Casey took the 2013-2014 off-season seriously and trained very hard through his rehab period, he would show up to the Giants camp without his trademark velocity – throwing just 89-91 MPH and topping out at 92 MPH. His command wasn’t terrible but it wasn’t good either, and he was swiftly cut from the roster.

Casey’s teammate at Vanderbilt (Caleb Cotham, Yankees) had trained remotely with me over the 2013-2014 off-season and Caleb highly recommended that Casey email me for more information and to see if I could help restore his velocity.

On March 27th, Casey fired off an email to me stating his history, unsure of where to go from here. I responded that he was welcome to train here and that we just had two unaffiliated professionals leave our facility (previously with the Nationals and Phillies), so it was a good time to get some individual attention. After going over the training plans and fees, Casey committed to training here for an indeterminate amount of time with the minimum being around 2 weeks of full-time training. He expressed his fear of regressing back to having elbow pain once again, and I assured him that our program was first developed to help reduce short-term pain and hopefully ingrain long-term health, and through those methods, we believed velocity would be more easily developed.

So, knowing that he had two elbow surgeries – one just a few months prior – I naturally took it easy on him on his first day, right? Not exactly. Here’s what I said in an email to the Driveline Baseball Email List:

On day one, I had him throwing Driveline Elite Weighted Baseballs and Driveline PlyoCare Balls and took tons of high-speed video and radar readings of his throws. What the data revealed was obvious to me after thousands and thousands of repetitions of watching pitchers throw and marrying it to real research – Casey did not adequately control the direction, timing, and magnitude of extension of his pitching elbow. Further probing revealed that Casey had issues with hyperextension of the pitching elbow, which made total sense.

Yes, you read that correctly, I had Casey throwing one and two kilogram PlyoCare balls as well as 9 ounce weighted baseballs on the first day he was here. (After taking video of him in our biomechanics lab and showing him the lengthy warm-up / arm care protocol we have, of course.)

Driveline MegaKit

The look on his face after I told him to throw weighted baseballs as hard as he possibly could was pretty funny. Casey wasn’t argumentative, however, and he completed his first round of Ballistic Efficiency Testing, clocking a whopping 93 MPH on a maximum effort pull-down with a regular five-ounce baseball.

Not too impressive. But the spread of velocities told me something in addition to the high-speed video and four-camera synchronized video I shot – Casey was holding back. He was able to throw overloaded baseballs at a velocity far too close to a regular baseball, yet his underload throws were fairly standard. The arm strength was there – the reciprocal inhibition is what was killing him.

I showed him video of him in the Futures Game, of his draft video coming out of Vanderbilt, and the video we shot in the lab. I told him that he needed to be like the guy at Vanderbilt with just two mechanical tweaks that could be felt using our overload/underload training program using wrist weights and various weighted implements – so we started undoing all the “take it easy” programming he got in pro ball and started reprogramming his central nervous system using specifically crafted drills, including hundreds of throws at submaximal intensity of underload baseballs to develop the correct relationship between his throwing hand and his throwing elbow.

Casey Weathers - Vanderbilt

Restoring the velocity of a pitcher like Casey is a lot easier than it is to develop in a 16 year old high school pitcher. I told him on day one that I was extremely confident that we’d restore his velocity to close to what he was throwing at Vanderbilt, and if he continued to train using our methods, that he should be able to return to full strength while maintaining a healthy mechanical pattern. At this point, he was all for it.

He would throw a bullpen to one of my clients, Brendan Illies (Puyallup HS). In the bullpen, he sat 90-92 – not appreciably better than he was in Spring Training, but at least this was an indoor bullpen session and should expect to be better outdoors against hitters. Still, I wasn’t banking on it, and neither was Casey. He would show up 5-6 days a week to train individually and in a group setting with my other clients, many of them high schoolers. Every day he came in, he learned something new – rebounders to develop force acceptance, tons of use on the Marc Pro for electrical muscle stimulation, hundreds of reps using PlyoCare balls to develop proper mechanical patterns, and lifting a bunch of free weights to maintain his strength levels.

Then we’d evaluate and test, over and over again. Iteration is the key to success in our program, and Casey would be no different. His velocity began to pick up, and ten days after he began training here, progress was coming along:

Not satisfied with those numbers, we scheduled another velocity testing day four days after the +10 day marker to officially cap off 2 weeks of training, and breakthroughs started to occur:

Weathers Velo 14 days

That’s more like it – 98.7 MPH isn’t too bad at all. Casey was throwing more often and with more intensity and never once complained about significant arm pain. Sure, he’d have the tweak here or there, but I reminded him that’s when he was regressing back into a painful pattern, and overloaded implements helped him explore the limits of those mechanical issues. When Casey was at his best, he was ripping off near 110 MPH underload throws at my face:

Casey Weathers Underload

After a few indoor target sessions to work on his command – which was getting better all the time through proprioceptive improvement and virtually NO work on it specifically – I felt confident that he could throw to hitters and be successful. Through the gracious help of Coach Wiese at Puyallup HS, I arranged for Casey to throw to volunteers from Puyallup HS who were on their way to an undefeated season in the SPSL 4A league and earning themselves a top-25 national ranking in the process. I told Casey these kids could be a pain in the ass and that he should go right after them, after all, more than a handful of them had significant Division-I scholarships to schools like North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, and Oregon State. He made some disparaging comments about the Pac-12 and ACC (being a former SEC closer, of course), but smiled and took the mound.

His command was significantly better than expected, and while his slider was a work in progress (watch the above video for one particularly nasty slider from the rear view – sorry, Adam Stump), his velocity had jumped up from the 89-91 MPH range he was at in Spring Training, touching 96 MPH.

Casey 96 MPH

We went back to work to develop arm strength and durability in addition to trying to eke out some more velocity gains. At this point, I emailed the various local scouts that I knew as well as some scouting directors I was friends with and told them about Casey’s resurgence. More than a few organizations were interested, and some fairly important people came out to see him at his last live hitters session (once again versus Puyallup HS) where his slider was incredibly sharp and he sat 94-95 MPH.

The End of the Beginning

Casey would return home with a parting gift in his travel bag – a full set of Driveline PlyoCare Balls, Elite Weighted Balls, and Jaeger Sports J-Bands for at-home training (all available in the Driveline Velocity and Arm Care MegaKit).

I sent him his remote training program so he could continue to work hard, and we stayed in frequent touch over a period of two weeks. I opened up a channel with his agent, Mark Pieper of Relativity Sports, as well as other scouts who previously expressed interest in Casey’s progress, until the inevitable happened – Casey would sign as a free agent on May 16th, 2014, with the Tampa Bay Rays – joining the organization that has treated his former Vanderbilt teammate so well, David Price.

I couldn’t be more happy for Casey. He truly embraced the facility’s motto – Rest is Atrophy – and set a great example for our high school athletes. He was ready to discard everything he thought he knew about training and was very open-minded about the entire process, asking tons of questions along the way to further his own understanding of the material in addition to simply training very hard to get better.

Whether or not Casey succeeds in professional baseball – and I’m betting he’ll do just fine – he’s already proven that velocity can be developed and restored safely, despite the fact that few coaches and trainers in the professional ranks think it can happen. And even if they believe it can happen, they sure as hell don’t think “weighted baseballs” are the way to do it, especially with guys who have had arm surgery (two, in Casey’s situation).

I look forward to seeing Casey this coming off-season to continue to work, especially alongside our ragtag group of professionals like Trevor Bauer. The crowd will be bigger this time around, but the spirit of the facility always remains the same – and that’s the real reason our program works.

Casey Bullpen

Here’s what Casey had to say about his training time at Driveline Baseball – presented totally unedited:

I was nervous at first to start an intensive program like Kyle’s. After 2 elbow surgeries and Chronic elbow pain, how would my arm hold up to throwing weighted balls at maximum intensity? Within two weeks all of my concerns had been alleviated. Kyle has an advanced understanding of the research that is available in the biomechanics and pitching community. It impressed me even more how incredibly driven he is to continue to learn.

Kyle’s program brought me back from a guy scared to throw because I didn’t want to agitate my arm, to throwing with full intent every day and more volume than I had since 2007 in college. I spent the majority of my career protecting my arm and not using it. It felt great to actually practice with athleticism and purpose again. I really feel like Kyle gave that back to me and more.

He went above and beyond what a pitching coach could do for a player. I can’t thank Kyle enough for breathing life back into my career. I will continue to work with Kyle because I truly believe in the benefits of the program.

Momentum and Arm Action: Myths and Misunderstandings

Pitching mechanics is a difficult subject to talk about, and one that I don’t touch lightly on this blog. Covering the basics of pitching mechanics like stride length, stride speed, hip/shoulder separation, and even pronation are generally not the topics I tend to discuss – at least not without a significant amount of data. With this post, I’d like to talk about the concept of momentum as it exists in the baseball pitching delivery compared to the generally-accepted definition of the term in the world of physics (classical mechanics, to be precise).

Momentum’s real definition – long before deep analysis of pitching mechanics ever existed – is simply:

…a quantity expressing the motion of a body or system, equal to the product of the mass of a body and its velocity.

Its formula is p = mv; momentum is equal to mass times velocity.

Momentum and Arm Action

Stephen Strasburg

Paul Nyman described the ultimate goal of developing pitching velocity as connecting momentum in the delivery, that connective tissue are springs that are to be loaded and unloaded. Nyman’s general descriptions of intent and momentum in the delivery were (and remain) breakthroughs in understanding how velocity is really developed.

In the physical world, we are bound to the law of Conservation of Momentum, which states:

…a body at rest remains at rest and a body in motion continues to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.

This is also known as the Law of Inertia, Newton’s First Law.

However, the fact that momentum is conserved has been twisted when it comes to baseball pitching mechanics. Nyman and others have posited that a constant flow of momentum being connected from proximal to distal is ideal for developing elite fastball velocities.

Let me be clear about this: I agree with the overall modern day understanding of the kinetic chain (proximal to distal, largest to smallest), but not with the idea that momentum is conserved in such a manner. What is being described is simply efficient sequencing of body parts, not the “elastic storage” of energy necessarily.

Summation of Speed

Taking a Look at the Data

When American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) studied Dr. Mike Marshall’s throwing technique in 2008, they released data that showed bucketed ranges for their “elite” and “mediocre” group pitchers to compare the “torque” group with.

If you have never seen a Dr. Marshall pitcher, then you should probably watch some of this high-speed clip of Mike Farrenkopf throwing at ASMI’s labs:

Leaving aside the unorthodoxy of Marshall’s technique, several major points arise from the data provided by ASMI.

1. Hip rotation velocity is simply not that important.

Comparing the Elite Group (85-89 MPH in lab settings) of pitchers with the Mediocre Group (74-77 MPH in lab settings) of pitchers reveals that the elite throwers have a mean maximum pelvis rotation velocity of 598.5 deg/sec while the mediocre group was at 532 deg/sec. A delta of 66 deg/sec was less than one standard deviation (522 to 675, SD of 76.5) in the elite throwers’ group for hip rotation velocity.

Other existing research corroborates this finding. In Kinematic comparisons of different pitch velocity groups in baseball using motion model method (Takahashi, Fujii, et al ISBS 2002), researchers found that peak hip rotation velocities showed no appreciable difference between high and low velocity groups, but rather timing was far more important. In fact, the high velocity group tended to reach peak hip rotation earlier than the low velocity group, which runs counter to what most modern pitching coaches teach (rotate the hips as late as possible).

Kinematic Comparisons

Those pitching coaches that preach hip rotation velocity is important should probably review the research literature on the subject to re-evaluate their claims.

2. Momentum into Shoulder External Rotation was unimportant

When asked to describe connecting momentum into the arm action phase of the delivery, many modern pitching coaches assert that the speed of the distal wrist entering shoulder external rotation creates a greater elastic stretch of the internal rotators and “stores” energy in connective tissue. (OK, most don’t describe it with that terminology, but that’s what they mean.) This seems to make sense. Ever watch the NFL combine high jump test?

What do you see? The jumper makes an immediate countermovement (squat) and explosively drives off of the flexed knees to create the maximum amount of ground reaction forces (GRFs) to propel himself skyward.

Since shoulder internal rotation velocity is highly coupled with ball velocity (throwing a ball is mostly shoulder internal rotation + elbow extension), we should seek high angular velocities of shoulder external rotation, right?

Perhaps not. Consider that the shoulder-scapular complex is not necessarily designed to externally rotate to 170-180 degrees as shown below:

Billy Wagner at MER

Can you get your arm in this position without throwing a ball or other object? I didn’t think so.

However, knees were designed to be flexed and extended like the high jumper in the above video, which makes that movement optimal.

The data seems to support this line of thinking, too. In the aforementioned ASMI data set, elite pitchers generate an average peak angular velocity of shoulder external rotation of 1578.5 deg/sec (1291 to 1866 +/- 1 SD 287.5). The Marshall pitchers generate an average peak value of just 405 deg/sec.

This is astronomically different – you are talking about a four standard deviation difference between Marshall pitchers and elite traditional pitchers. This is a massive outlier, and in itself it is proof that Marshall’s pitchers more or less do as he asks (minimize reverse forearm bounce, as he calls it).

Since Marshall’s pitchers have such terrible countermovement into shoulder external rotation, their ball velocity must be massively different, right? Well, this is a complicated question. The short answer is “yes,” because Marshall pitchers threw an average of 77 MPH compared to the 85-89 MPH range of elite pitchers. But mediocre pitchers threw just 74-77 MPH and their average peak angular velocity of shoulder external rotation was 1530 deg/sec. What? Read that again, and look two paragraphs up. Note that mediocre pitchers had statistically insigificantly lower countermovement into shoulder external rotation than elite pitchers!

This statistic alone should be enough to bust the idea that the speed at which the forearm lays back into external rotation is important, but it goes further than that. The faster the arm lays back in external rotation, the faster the arm must rebound into internal rotation to drive the ball to the plate. This creates a ton of torque and plyometric stress at the elbow (dynamically stabilizing the joint against valgus stress) and the shoulder.

What’s more is this astonishing statistic – Marshall’s pitchers generated elite levels of peak shoulder internal rotation angular velocity (7899 deg/sec vs. 7547 deg/sec) AND peak elbow extension angular velocity (2509 deg/sec vs. 2413 deg/sec). Remember, these are not accelerations – they are velocities, meaning their arm was moving just as fast as the elite pitching group’s! Why didn’t this translate into better ball velocity? I covered this in another blog post titled Reviewing ASMI’s Biomechanical Analysis of Dr. Marshall’s Pitchers, where I posited the following theory (referencing the forced activation of the flexor-pronator mass in the Marshall pitching mechanic):

This is what is happening when you powerfully contract the pronator muscles in the forearm: You are very likely protecting the ligaments in the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) while simultaneously generating equivalent IR Velocity, Elbow Extension Velocity, and related torques (which are just derivatives of acceleration of body parts; this is typically done using inverse dynamics as outlined by Zatsiorsky) – but you’re getting much lower final velocities of the baseball due to this “stiff” portion violating the kinetic chain. Additionally, due to the rotating forearm as the arm is accelerated forward, the wrist is not laid back for the final acceleration into ball release.

3. Kinetics and Joint Loading Numbers Don’t Tell the Entire Story

A biomechanics researcher occasionally opines to me, wondering why the field of baseball biomechanics is so in love with joint torques and loads. He explains that nearly all other mechanical fields do not view these numbers as absolute, but merely guiding numbers – and connections between joints and structural integrity/strength is far more relevant in their research.

Such are my feelings about absolute joint torques and loads. For example – it is well-documented that Marshall’s pitchers rarely hurt themselves while pitching (I suppose a few would find objection with this statement, but it is more or less true if you’re not being pedantic – Jeff Sparks’ UCL rupture cannot reasonably be blamed on the Marshall technique) despite throwing 2 – 10 lb. iron balls and training with up to 25+ lb wrist weights, all on top of throwing to maximum effort every single day. Yet in ASMI’s study of their pitchers, they concluded that Marshall pitchers generate equivalent torques on their shoulders and elbows as the elite pitchers did, which only makes sense given their internal rotation and elbow extension angular velocities were so high (and accelerations must have been higher given the lower rates of maximum shoulder external rotation).

Joel Zumaya

How is this possible? As stated multiple times before on this blog (this long article on Joel Zumaya’s elbow is a good start), the flexor-pronator mass dynamically stabilizes the elbow against valgus force and is thought to provide additional protection to the UCL during baseball pitching. Additionally, the lack of rebound from shoulder ER to IR may be a relevant factor that was not quantifiable at the time of the study – a theory that holds some merit, since we know that bone is sensitive to loading rate when it comes to pitching mechanics.

From Whence Arm Speed Comes From

If the speed at which the arm lays back isn’t relevant to creating fastball velocity, but internal rotation angular velocity (mediocre: 5873.5 deg/sec, elite: 7547 deg/sec) and elbow extension angular velocities (mediocre: 1978.5 deg/sec, elite: 2413 deg/sec) are massively important, then how do we create a faster arm? (For lack of a better term.)

The first answer is a cop out but unfortunately a very real one: A better genetic profile. If you were lucky enough to be gifted with faster-firing muscle fibers in the relevant areas of the body (internal rotators, elbow extensors), then you will probably “naturally” throw harder than your neighbor. Since we can’t control that factor, let’s acknowledge it but ignore it.

Javelin Throw

Power and speed-strength can still be developed in the pitching arm (despite what you hear from traditional pitching coaches who think velocity is god-given), which is why weighted baseballs make up a large part of our training in the Elite Pitcher Program at Driveline Baseball. Yes, their mechanical autoregulation cues are good (and important), but developing speed-strength using under/overload training has scientific merit dating all the way back to the Soviet Sports Science projects of the early 20th century.

Additionally, a better understanding of the agonist-antagonist relationship of the pitching arm (and its surrounding musculature) can help us develop velocity indirectly. By strengthening the decelerators and improving recovery of the pitching arm in the delivery, the arm is free to move faster without inhibition; your subconscious motor control is often better than your conscious brain at determining what movements will injure the human body. This is the theory behind using wrist weights, heavy plyometric balls, and sport-specific lifting exercises in the weight room to not only increase endurance of the muscles that help protect the arm, but to increase the contractile strength of them and possibly unlock fastball velocity in doing so.

Hardly the End Story

While few of you have made it this far into the blog post, I’m afraid to say that this is just a very topical review of one small segment of pitching mechanics. Further research and experimentation is required to get the best out of our athletes, which is why research in the Driveline Sports Science lab never stops. I’m excited to see what additional research using EMG sensors will bring (we already have a lot of neat data), especially in combination with force plates and our existing biomechanics lab with high-speed cameras.

Let me give you something to think about that we recently discovered 4-6 months ago that became vitally important in how we train our athletes. Take a look at this graph of elbow extension/flexion angular velocities from the aforementioned paper by Takahashi et al – and try to grasp the importance of the slope, magnitude, and timing of the graph when comparing high vs. low velocity pitchers. The answer may just shock you.

Elbow Comparison